For industry buyers
Decision-grade quantum benchmarksfor a real workload, not a slide deck.
Kvantiq Studio evaluates whether quantum computing is ready for your specific use case — across hardware vendors, across SDKs, under a methodology your procurement and your CTO can both verify. Funded under the Independence Policy. Results citable via DOI.
Why this is different
Three things you don’t get from a vendor whitepaper.
Independence
Independent verification, not vendor marketing
Kvantiq is not a hardware vendor and not a quantum software vendor. We do not benefit from any specific vendor winning the comparison. Funding rules are written down — see the Independence Policy — and every published result discloses its sponsorship, on every page that mentions it.
Methodology
Reproducible methodology, peer-reviewable
The Kvantiq Evaluation Protocol (KEP) and the Kvantiq Bench Score (KBS) are public, versioned, and peer-reviewable in git. Every score we publish carries axis-level confidence intervals — fidelity, resource cost, robustness, reproducibility. Replication failures are published with the same prominence as successes.
Citability
Citable results with DOIs, not slide decks
Every benchmark run on Kvantiq mints a DOI via Zenodo. Your procurement memo, your board paper, your internal feasibility report can cite a frozen-version, reproducible artifact instead of a vendor PDF. That is the difference between a marketing claim and a decision-grade input.
Engagement lifecycle
Discover → Scope → Pilot → Cycle.
A scoped, time-boxed engagement with a deliverable in writing. You see the question, the methodology, the price, and the timeline before you commit anything.
Discover
You describe the workload (chemistry, optimisation, ML, simulation, error correction). We share which existing benchmarks already apply and what would need custom design. No commitment.
Scope
Written engagement brief: the question your decision rests on, the methodology we will use, the SDKs and hardware paths in scope, the deliverable, the timeline, the fixed price. You sign or walk away.
Pilot
We run the benchmark against the methodology. Findings include axis-level KBS scores with confidence intervals, full reproducibility receipts, DOI-citable artifacts, and a written interpretation in plain language. Public or NDA-bound — your call.
Cycle
Hardware moves. Methodology evolves. Engagements that benefit from re-evaluation cycle on a quarterly cadence, so your decision is anchored to current data instead of last year’s vendor demo.
Procurement-defensible
Methodology is in public git. Results are DOI-citable. Funding is disclosed. Your procurement team and your auditors get answers they can verify without taking our word for it.
Vendor-neutral by construction
Identical methodology runs across all six major SDKs — Qiskit, PennyLane, Braket, OpenQASM, CUDA-Q, Cirq. If the comparison favours a vendor, it is because the methodology said so, not because we re-tuned for them.
Built for the “is it ready?” question
We exist for the moment an industry team needs to answer “is quantum useful for our workload, on real hardware, today?” — and needs an answer their CFO and their CTO both trust.
Advisors
Practitioners shaping the methodology.
Maxime Oliva
Senior Quantum Researcher, Novo Nordisk
Benchmark design advisor
An independent advisory board — practitioners from academia, industry research, and quantum standards work — is being formed for Q3 2026, before Kvantiq accepts its first paid vendor-certification engagement. See §5 Governance for the timeline.
You have a workload. We have a methodology. Let’s answer the question.
Thirty-minute scoping call. No commitment. We come back with a written engagement brief, a fixed price, and a deliverable date — or a recommendation that you don’t need us yet.